Tax Considerations for Relocating Employees from Canada to the USA? Back
The tax implications of relocating employees to the US should be considered well in advance of initiating any transfer. Profesional advice should be sought before acting on any information in this article.
by Wayne Bewick, CA, CFP, CPA(IL)

Relocating employees from Canada to the US can have serious implications for both employees and employers. If tax issues are not properly managed before the employee commences work in the U.S., both the employee and the company can incur significant additional tax costs. The tax implications vary with each individual’s specific circumstances, making it imperative to plan in advance prior to selecting the most suitable individuals for the move.

Arguably, with the continued increase in globalization comes the need for an internationally transportable workforce, which is crucial for keeping global companies ahead of their competitors. However, finding talented individuals who are able and willing to relocate is a difficult task due to the numerous issues that both employees and companies may face.

Among the most important questions that should be asked are: Will the employee relocate alone or with their family? Will there be any immigration difficulties? What costs are involved? Is the return on the investment worthwhile for the company, given that expatriates can cost as much as three times (or more) the rate of local hires.

Although these are all significant issues, there are also vital tax concerns faced by both the employee and the company when contemplating having the employee work in the U.S. as a part of the initial strategy in determining whether a particular employee is a good fit for a transfer. In reality, the tax issues are often not considered far enough in advance, if at all, and this invariably leads to problems. Where the tax issues are not properly managed before the employee begins work in the U.S., both the employee and the company can incur significant additional tax costs.

In order to meet the needs of the company and the employee, there are typically three scenarios under which Canadians work in the U.S.: the intermittent or frequent business traveller, the temporary assignee, and the employee who permanently relocates. Each situation can have varying tax implications and understanding the diverse consequences can be quite complex.

The intermittent or frequent business traveller is an individual who works in the U.S. but either returns home on the weekends or only stays in the U.S. for a few weeks at a time. This type of business traveller tends to keep their personal belongings, permanent residence and family in Canada and generally maintain their Canadian residency status for tax purposes.

The temporary assignee is typically an individual that relocates for a specified time or project but generally intends to return to Canada when the time period or project is complete. Whether it is for 6 months or two years, it will usually involve the transferee being in the U.S. for extended periods of time, with infrequent returns to Canada. The employee may or may not keep his/her family, residence and belongings in Canada. In this situation, the employee may or may not continue to be a Canadian resident for tax purposes. There are often significant tax planning opportunities for the temporary assignee, especially if ceasing residency is an option.

The permanent relocation scenario is somewhat self-explanatory. It generally involves the individual obtaining a permanent residence abroad as well as breaking most of their Canadian residential ties since there is an expectation that the individual will not return to Canada. In this instance, the individual ceases to be a Canadian resident for tax purposes.

There are various tax issues involved for each of the three situations discussed. However, the most common issues to be considered are:

  1. Determining residency status from both a Canadian and U.S. perspective;
  2. The tax implications of selling or renting their principal residence;
  3. Deemed dispositions and the related departure tax; and
  4. Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) issues.
Canadian residency
For Canadian tax purposes, the concept of residency is an important one since Canada imposes tax on the worldwide income of its residents. Therefore, whether an individual is a resident of Canada or a non-resident of Canada is central to determining the overall tax liability of the individual. The disparity in the individual’s tax liability is greater when the individual is relocating to a lower tax jurisdiction.

Canadian residency is a difficult concept in that it is a question of fact and is largely based on an individual’s demonstrated intentions. An individual is considered to be a resident of Canada if they maintain their home in Canada and have the majority of their economic, personal and social ties in Canada. Even if an individual moves to the U.S, he/she may still be considered a Canadian resident for tax purposes if any primary residential ties are maintained.

If the employee is in a position to cease Canadian residency for tax purposes, depending on the facts of their situation, the employee may be able to lower their world-wide tax liability, depending on what state and tax rate they are subject to in the U.S. In these situations, the employee should have a discussion with a tax professional that deals with expatriate tax issues to determine if it is possible to become a non-resident for tax purposes and if so, to out-line the necessary steps to be taken to achieve this.

U.S residency
Unlike the Canadian residency rules, the U.S rules for determining an individual’s residency status are clearly stated under U.S. law. Under U.S. law, there are two objective tests that are used for determining if an individual is considered to be a resident for income tax purposes. An individual’s U.S immigration status is the determinant for the first residency test. An individual who is a "green card" holder or permanent resident is deemed to be a U.S. resident from the first day he/she is present in the U.S. with a valid green card. The consequences for employees with green cards are that they have to file U.S. returns on which they must include their worldwide income on a yearly basis. Even if an employee who worked in the U.S. and obtained a green card returns to Canada, they will still have to file U.S. returns on an annual basis unless they rescind their green card, which is another tax implication that should not be taken lightly. This annual filing requirement can be quite costly to the employee.

The second test is called the “substantial presence test”. Generally, an individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during a calendar year will be regarded as a U.S. resident for part of the year. This test is to be applied on a cumulative basis. An individual who is present in the U.S. during the current year and the two preceding years for a weighted average of 183 days or more, will be regarded as a resident. An individual must be physically present in the U.S. for any part of at least the 31 days during the current calendar year and 183 days during the current and two preceding calendar years, counting the sum of all the days of physical presence in the current year, one-third of the number of days of presence in the first preceding year, and one-sixth of the number of days of presence in the second preceding year.

Deemed dispositions and departure tax
In instances where an individual ceases their Canadian residency, (some short-term assignee individuals and permanent transfers) they are deemed to have disposed of all their capital property, other than certain specific property, for its fair market value on the date they ceased to be a Canadian resident. The intent of the deemed disposition rules (commonly referred to as “departure tax rules”) is to ensure that the appreciation of the capital property owned by a Canadian while a resident of Canada is subject to Canadian capital gains tax. The property that is excluded from the departure tax rules are: real property situated in Canada, pensions and retirement savings vehicles such as RRSP’s, RRIF’s, DPSP’s, and RESP’s, employee stock options, rights to benefits under most employee benefit plans, interests in Canadian trusts that were not acquired for consideration, and life insurance policies in Canada (other than segregated fund policies). The reason for this is that Canada retains the right to tax this property even if its owner is a non-resident of Canada.

The tax owing on a deemed disposition is due by April 30th of the calendar year following the year of departure, which is the normal filing date for Canadian tax returns. The individual can elect to defer the tax owing on the deemed disposition, without interest, and pay it when the property has been sold or otherwise disposed of. The reason for the deferral is that the tax owing could be burdensome if funds are not readily available to the taxpayer. This is often the case given that the assets on which the deemed disposition has occurred have not actually been disposed of. This deferral is possible only if an election is filed with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) by the April 30th filing deadline. If the tax arising on the deemed disposition is in excess of $25,000, adequate security must be provided to the CCRA. Providing the security is sometimes an issue for the employee and a determination should be made before the employee relocates as to who will be responsible for providing this security, the taxpayer or the employer.

Principal residence
There should be no immediate tax implications with respect to an individual’s principal residence as a result of their departure from Canada if the property is sold prior to their departure. However, if the principal residence is eventually sold by the relocating employee, (relevant to some shortterm assignee individuals and permanent transfers) as a non-resident of Canada, they are required to file certain forms in order to notify the CRA of the disposition and request a clearance certificate. In addition, a withholding tax of 25% of the estimated taxable capital gain, if any, must be remitted along with the required forms at the time the clearance certificate is requested. Typically, the individual’s lawyer or legal counsel files this form on their behalf at the time of sale.

Where no clearance certificate is obtained prior to the disposition, the purchaser is required to withhold and remit 25% of the gross property sale proceeds. Therefore, it is important to ensure a clearance certificate is obtained. There are also various issues and required tax filings when a Canadian non-resident rents out their home during their absence from Canada which should also be addressed by the employee, but are beyond the scope of this article.

RRSP issues
Under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, RRSP accounts can continue to grow tax free in both the U.S. and Canada until disposed. A beneficiary of a Canadian RRSP may elect to defer the U.S. taxation of income earned in the RRSP until such time as a distribution is made from the plan. As previously discussed, RRSPs are not subject to the deemed disposition rules and, accordingly, there is no additional tax owing upon departure from Canada (relevant to some short-term assignee individuals and permanent transfers).

Funds that are withdrawn from an RRSP by a non-resident of Canada in the U.S. will be subject to withholding tax at a rate of 25%. Since the 25% withholding tax rate can be significantly lower than the individual’s marginal tax rate in Canada, some tax planning opportunities should be considered when contemplating withdrawing amounts from an RRSP. An additional concern for employees who are ceasing their Canadian residency is the loss of RRSP contribution limit room as RRSP contribution room is based on earned income and can only be created by residents of Canada.

Conclusion
Since it is impossible to cover every conceivable tax issue faced by an employee relocating to the U.S., we have only briefly outlined some of the more common ones. For this reason, as part of the initial process in determining whether an individual should be sent to the U.S. to work, it is important to consider how this decision will affect the employee’s personal tax situation. This should be done well before an individual commences any work in the U.S. in order to minimize the costs to both the employee and employer. A specialized tax accountant should be consulted to assist in determining the best course of action, to minimize both the current and future tax liabilities, and to minimize any duress that could be caused from any non-compliance with the relevant taxation authorities.

Wayne is a Tax Advisor with Trowbridge Professional Corporation, Chartered Accountants | Tax Advisors, and specializes in both Canadian and U.S. taxation. The firm focuses on international tax services for Canadians and Americans around the world. For further information on their firm and the services they provide, you can contact them at their Toronto office at 416-214-7833, visit their website at:

Phone416-214-7833
Emailwayne.bewick@trowbridgepc.ca
Webwww.trowbridgepc.ca



















































































Back